Skip to content

The Dissent Papers

The Voices of Diplomats in the Cold War and Beyond

Hannah Gurman
Barcode 9780231158725
Book

Sold out
Original price £53.56 - Original price £53.56
Original price
£53.56
£53.56 - £53.56
Current price £53.56

Click here to join our rewards scheme and earn points on this purchase!

Availability:
Out of stock

Release Date: 24/01/2012

Genre: Society & Culture
Sub-Genre: Social Sciences
Label: Columbia University Press
Language: English
Publisher: Columbia University Press
Pages: 296

The Voices of Diplomats in the Cold War and Beyond. Beginning with the Cold War and concluding with the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Hannah Gurman explores the overlooked opposition of U.S. diplomats to American foreign policy in the latter half of the twentieth century. During America's reign as a dominant world power, U.S. presidents and senior foreign policy officials largely ignored or rejected their diplomats' reports, memos, and telegrams, especially when they challenged key policies relating to the Cold War, China, and the wars in Vietnam and Iraq. The Dissent Papers recovers these diplomats' invaluable perspective and their commitment to the transformative power of diplomatic writing. Gurman showcases the work of diplomats whose opposition enjoyed some success. George Kennan, John Stewart Service, John Paton Davies, George Ball, and John Brady Kiesling all caught the attention of sitting presidents and policymakers, achieving temporary triumphs yet ultimately failing to change the status quo. Gurman follows the circulation of documents within the State Department, the National Security Council, the C.I.A., and the military, and she details the rationale behind "The Dissent Channel," instituted by the State Department in the 1970s, to both encourage and contain dissent.Advancing an alternative narrative of modern U.S. history, she connects the erosion of the diplomatic establishment and the weakening of the diplomatic writing tradition to larger political and ideological trends while, at the same time, foreshadowing the resurgent significance of diplomatic writing in the age of Wikileaks.