Skip to content
10% OFF EVERYTHING when you spend £20 - Use Code: RWMAR10 - Must end Wednesday 1st 9am
10% OFF EVERYTHING when you spend £20 - Use Code: RWMAR10 - Ends Wednesday 9am

An Analysis of David Graeber's Debt

Sulaiman Hakemy

The First 5,000 Years

Barcode 9781912128792
Paperback

Original price £7.56 - Original price £7.56
Original price
£7.56
£7.56 - £7.56
Current price £7.56

Click here to join our rewards scheme and earn points on this purchase!

Availability:
Low Stock
FREE shipping

Release Date: 15/07/2017

Genre: Society & Culture
Sub-Genre: Psychology
Label: Macat International Limited
Series: Macat Library
Language: English
Publisher: Macat International Limited

The First 5,000 Years
Born in 1961, US anthropologist and activist David Graeber was weaned on leftist politics, and declared himself an anarchist at age 16.

Debt is one of the great subjects of our day, and understanding the way that it not only fuels economic growth, but can also be used as a means of generating profit and exerting control, is central to grasping the way in which our society really works.

David Graeber's contribution to this debate is to apply his anthropologists' training to the understanding of a phenomenon often considered purely from an economic point of view. In this respect, the book can be considered a fine example of the critical thinking skill of problem-solving. Graeber's main aim is to undermine the dominant narrative, which sees debt as the natural – and broadly healthy – outcome of the development of a modern economic system. He marshals evidence that supports alternative possibilities, and suggests that the phenomenon of debt emerged not as a result of the introduction of money, but at precisely the same time.

This in turn allows Graeber to argue against the prevailing notion that economy and state are fundamentally separate entities. Rather, he says, "the two were born together and have always been intertwined" – with debt being a means of enforcing elite and state power. For Graeber, this evaluation of the evidence points to a strong potential solution: there should be more readiness to write off debt, and more public involvement in the debate over debt and its moral implications.