No Place for Ethics
No Place for Ethics
Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States
Paperback
Couldn't load pickup availability
Join our rewards scheme and earn 93 reward points on this purchase!
Earn 93 points on this!
Sign in or Sign up!- Release Date: 12/04/2023
- Barcode: 9781683933250

No Place for Ethics
Couldn't load pickup availability
Collapsible content
DESCRIPTION
Judicial Review, Legal Positivism, and the Supreme Court of the United States In No Place for Ethics, Hill argues the Supreme Court has an overriding obligation to ground its judicial review responsibilities not only in the Constitution but also in ethics, understood as the Constitution's ultimate justification. The text discusses a response to the question basic to all human beings: how should I behave? In No Place for Ethics, Hill argues that contemporary judicial review by the U.S. Supreme Court rests on its mistaken positivist understanding of law—law simply because so ordered—as something separate from ethics. Further, to assert any relation between the two is to contaminate both, either by turning law into an arm of ethics, or by making ethics an expression of law. This legal positivism was on full display recently when the Supreme Court declared that the CDC was acting unlawfully by extending the eviction moratorium to contain the spread of the Covid-19 Delta variant, something that, the Court admitted, was of indisputable benefit to the public. How mistaken however to think that acting for the good of the public is to act unlawfully when actually it is to act ethically and must therefore be lawful.
To address this mistake, Hill contends that an understanding of natural law theory provides the basis for a constitutive relation between ethics and law without confusing their distinct role in answering the basic question, how should I behave in society?
To secure that relation, the Court has an overriding responsibility when carrying out its review to do so with reference to normative ethics from which the U.S. Constitution is derived and to which it is accountable. While the Constitution confirms, for example, the liberty interests of individuals, it does not originate those interests which have their origin in human rights that long preceded it.
Essential to this argument is an appreciation of ethics as objective and based on principles, like those of justice, truth, and reason that ought to inform human behavior at its very springs. Applied in an analysis of five major Supreme Court cases, this appreciation of ethics reveals how wrongly decided these cases are.
DELIVERY & RETURNS
UK Delivery:
- Free delivery on all orders of £10 or more.
- £1.49 delivery fee on orders below £10.
- UK orders are shipped via Royal Mail 2nd Class.
International Delivery:
- Flat rate delivery charges vary by country.
Dispatch and Delivery Times:
- All orders are shipped from our warehouse in Northampton, UK within 48 hours of receipt during working hours.
- UK mainland orders typically arrive within 3-5 working days via Royal Mail 2nd Class.
- International estimated delivery times:
- Europe & Channel Islands: 7 to 10 working days
- USA: 7 to 15 working days
- Rest of the World: 9 to 21 working days
View our full delivery infomation here.
-
OVER
2 MILLION PRODUCTS
-
60 MILLION CUSTOMERS
ACROSS 190 COUNTRIES
You might also like
Loading recommendations...